Hello, I am Alex and I think Halo is tons better than Call of Duty. Halo has lots of campaigns and you can get in banshees and all of that. In Call of Duty you don't get vehicles, and you don't get to run around everywhere. In Halo you get to throw better grenades. I think that Halo 3 is tons better.

Hi. My name is Josiah. I am new to this project so please reply. I have played both games before and personally think that Halo is way better than Call of Duty.

I really think Call of Duty is much better because it really happened, but Halo is much more fun.

I have both a PS3 and Xbox and personally with the PS3 people virtually couldn't be any worse at Call of Duty 4.and Call of Duty World At War. I personally like Call Of Duty better because in Halo it involves a lot of skill. Also you need a lot of ammo to go a round. My preferance is Xbox live for Call of Duty 4 and World at War.

I think that Halo 3 is a way better game overall. I think it has a cooler campaign.

I would much rather play Call of Duty because I think that it is fun, and it feels more realistic than Halo 3.

I can say that Call of Duty is a much faster game. You literally have to shoot someone every time you turn and it relies on reflexes, which can be good and bad. I personally think it's more fun that way.

Jordan, I agree with you. Call Of Duty is way better.  Call Of Duty has more battles.

Hi bro, Call of Duty is better because Halo does not have battles that pop out at you.

Hi Adam, I don't agree with you. Call of Duty is better because Halo 3 is boring.

My name is Kelsey and I own a PS3. I think Call of Duty is much more fun and realistic, but I guess it really depends on if you have a PS3.  The PS3 has better graphics and is much more realistic.

Which is funner?  I personally think Halo 3 is funner on live, but the actual missions makes Call of Duty World at War better. I was wondering what every one thought.